As you can read in our previous post, Frank Hansen, the man who originally exhibited the Minnesota Iceman in the 1960s and 70s, revealed in a 1970 article in Saga Magazine that he himself was the one who shot the creature while hunting in the deep woods of Minnesota.
Keep that in mind as you read this next story (click on the link below), which details some interviews with Frank Hansen in his final years. If the following account is true, why would Hansen in his later years go back to his original story about the mysterious California millionaire who supposedly was the real owner of the “Creature in Ice?”
This is a must-read for anyone who wants to hear Frank’s final words on the Minnesota Iceman. It is truly fascinating, but ultimately raises more questions than it answers…
http://jevningresearch.blogspot.com/2012/01/dmitri-bayanov-update-on-minnesota.html
OPENS TODAY
CORRECTION: In response to all the news reports that I had purchased the Minnesota Iceman from the family of Frank Hansen, that is absolutely not true. I purchased it from another man, who purchased it from Hansen’s family shortly after Frank passed away 10 years ago. I apologize to the Hansen family for any undue attention this brings their way.
– Steve Busti, Museum of the Weird owner
There are several things that are impossible to fake first and foremost, my friend being a expert taxidermist said applying hair that magnified
Is coming from pours as in Human impossible to fake. In Taxidermy you would use a fine awl type instrument one at a time ? Not happening
Machine process would implant a synthetic or artificial hair But a pinch on removal would be slightly there a pond inspection. Let us see the hands and feet for prints and dermal ridges.
No dummy from the 1960s would have any of this .
This appears to be a undocumented ancestor to
US Modern man Neanderthal man I think is time the government stops ignoring the truth .
Yes it will shake up what we learned in school and that by protecting these cousins of man
$$ Billions of dollars will be lost in annual revenue .think about this for a moment. At least 25% minimum of our forest will be closed. Logging
In these areas now will be no more ,as well as camping,thousands of jobs lost, how about everything regarding local stores,restaurants, the trickle down effect is enormous. Think about
Over 2,500 native American tribes reference the hairy man of the woods ,could they all be wrong ,
As well as the hundreds of sightings each year
And documented tracks ,fakes cannot have dermal ridges,or try faking a 1to2 inch impression
In the ground going up a hill with a 6 foot strude. I tried this my 275lb frame sunk in less then a Half inch when jumping !! Open your minds
And remember just within the last few years Inn Africa a 6 ft chimp type ape was discovered.
In North America alone 1,00,000s of miles of wilderness has never been walked by man !!
It’s nice to see someone give intelligent arguments on the validity of the evidence. The fact you couldn’t make impressions even a quarter as deep as the tracks found is new to me, just more independent reinforcement of what I already believe to be true. There is a local story in Laguna New Mexico about a family that witnessed the shooting of a Yowi adolescent that was bothering their sheep, and when the authorities came they loaded the body up and were told it was ‘going to California’. Several people I know are familiar with these people and swear to the truth of this story. Mournful wails were heard afterward for a while to boot. The Government is afraid to have the truth about Bigfoot disseminated, as opposed to just saying a new hominid species or relative of Gigantopithicus exists, there appears something more significant about Sasquatch.
I seen the ice man at the Owatonna fair in the late 1970’s.
This is not the same creature that I seen. There wasn’t
that much hire on the one l seen. It looked more like a cave
man.
I remembered see the iceman in Woodland Ca back in around 1967 . the the white truck was park as you first entered the fair right across the tractor exhibit .as said the one I seen did have alot of hair the hair I seen was more like the hair on human little longer and thicker you could see through it seeing the skin skin also remember square teeths in its mouth .and blown out eye